Sunday, June 10, 2018

Here's what really happened at G7.

From what I've read so far, here's what I think happened at the G7. Trump goes to the G7 and threatens to end all trade with nations that refuse to end “unfair” trade practices and then shocks the heck out of everyone by calling for tariff-free TOTALLY FREE TRADE among all the countries. Trump rattles all the G7 nations with a startling proposal that all the nations DROP all their tariffs and trade restrictions. The biggest free trader of them all! Now what do they do? That's really going to mess with the media's "Trump is a protectionist" narrative!
“I don’t know if they were surprised with President Trump’s free-trade proclamation, but they certainly listened to it and we had lengthy discussions about that. If they thought they were going to lecture Trump on the glories of free trade, they got a rude awakening. He came to a gun fight armed with a stealth bomber.”
Trump tells the G7 that America wants reciprocal tariffs or none at all. He tells the G7 that American farmers and businesses won't be penalized any longer. He tells the G7 that America won't be the world's piggy bank any longer. Merkel agrees with Trump and says the devil is in the details. Trump also pushes for Russia to be reinstated into the G8. "We're running the world here and Russia should be at the table."
Trump says that America’s trading partners would be making a mistake if they retaliated against new U.S. tariffs.
“If they retaliate they’re making a tremendous mistake because you see we have a tremendous trade imbalance. The numbers are so much against them, we win that war 1000 times out of a 1000.”
All seven nations agree to sign a communique, which outlines a shared commitment to work on a variety of economic, social, environmental and security issues. The language on trade is general, with an acknowledgement that “free, fair and mutually beneficial trade and investment are key engines for growth and job creation” and a promise to “develop new rules where needed to foster a truly level playing field.” In other words, nothing substantive. Typical bureaucratic meaningless BS. It also includes a slap at Russia, calling on Moscow "to cease its destabilizing behavior to undermine democratic systems and its support of the Syrian regime.”
Then, after Trump’s departure from the G7, Trudeau holds a press conference to slam Trump and "show him" who's boss! Trudeau states that all of the member nations, including the U.S., have signed a communique pledging to lower tariffs and other trade barriers and that he was insulted by President Trump's tariffs on aluminum and steel. “I highlighted directly to the president that Canadians did not take it lightly that the United States has moved forward with significant tariffs on our steel and aluminum industry,” he said. Trudeau says his country will answer the US tariffs with levies of its own on July 1 unless Trump changes his mind.
Angry that Trudeau was grandstanding and did not make those statements to him personally at the conference, President Trump retracts his endorsement of the joint statement and threatens to mess with Canadian auto imports while on the plane to Singapore:
"Based on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's false statements at his news conference, and the fact that Canada is charging massive Tariffs to our U.S. farmers, workers and companies, I have instructed our U.S. Reps not to endorse the Communique as we look at Tariffs on automobiles flooding the U.S. Market! Justin acted so meek and mild during our G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, “US Tariffs were kind of insulting” and he “will not be pushed around.” Very dishonest & weak. Our Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on dairy!"
-President Trump
Trudeau responds weakly: “We are focused on everything we accomplished here at the G7 summit. The prime minister said nothing he hasn’t said before — both in public, and in private conversations with the president.”

Canada put a 270% tariff on dairy and messed with regulatory rules to artificially inflate prices in Canada. So why the big show with steel? Because this is how they all beat the previous US administrations. President Trump is not afraid to get TOUGH on behalf of the American worker!
Trudeau hates Trump. He thought these childish shenanigans would be a cool way to "get him." Team Trudeau is high-fiving right now - and getting love from every journalist, Globalist and US Democrat for clickbait headlines. But Trudeau has released the kraken: Trump is now coming for Canada's auto industry, that exports a million more cars to the U.S. than we import. Hope it was worth it.
If Trudeau is willing to take Canada into a trade war against the United States, maybe he should have built pipelines to tidewater -- Northern Gateway, Energy East & Trans Mountain. He derailed those three, so Canada is 100% dependent on the U.S. as their sole oil customer. Trudeau is not acting in Canada's best interests. Not smart at all. Trudeau knows that Canada needs America more than America needs Canada. He will lose.
Trump offered a tariff-free G7. If tariffs on the U.S. are the same as what the U.S. has on others, why didn’t Macron and Trudeau welcome and accept it? Because they know G7 countries have higher tariffs on the U.S. than what the U.S. has on them. They don’t want it to change.
Trump wants the US to charge other countries what they charge the US. It’s not free trade what’s going now; it’s crazy trade. The US subsidizes their various industries to the tune of $880 Billion annually due to pork barrel politics. To suggest a tariff-free G7 without a serious rollback of those subsidies is a non-starter. Will Congress give up what gets them elected? Not without some serious swamp draining, folks.

Larry Kudlow on Trudeau's press conference after the G7: "Trudeau really kind of stabbed us in the back with his amateurish attack. He did a great disservice to the whole G-7. Trudeau's comments were a betrayal and sophomoric. We negotiated in good faith. I personally negotiated with Prime Minister Trudeau. They have enormous tariffs.”


Director of Trade Policy Peter Navarro on Justin Trudeau:
"There's a special place in hell for any foreign leader that engages in bad faith diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump and then tries to stab him in the back on the way out the door. And that's what bad faith Justin Trudeau did with that stunt press conference. That's what weak, dishonest Justin Trudeau did. And that comes right from Air Force One.
And I'll tell you this, to my friends in Canada, that was one of the worst political miscalculations of a Canadian leader in modern Canadian history. All Justin Trudeau had to do was take the win. President Trump did the courtesy to Justin Trudeau to travel up to Quebec for that summit. He had other things, bigger things on his plate in Singapore. And what did Trudeau did -- do as soon as -- as soon as the plane took off from Canadian airspace, Trudeau stuck our president in the back. That will not stand.

Canada's high tariffs on American dairy products, and planned retaliatory tariffs, are an attack on our political system. And as far as this retaliation goes, the American press needs to do a much better job of what the Canadians are getting ready to do because it's nothing short of an attack on our political system and it's nothing short of Canada trying to raise its high protectionist barriers even higher on things like maple syrup and other goods."

The rest of the story:

In the days leading up to the G7 summit, Trudeau and his socialist cronies took a big hit in Canada when Doug Ford’s conservative movement won in the Ontario Province.

Therefore, for political reasons, Trudeau needed a G7 win. He needed to upstage conservative U.S. President Trump and get him to sign-on to the G7 communique, giving the summit the appearance of influence and success. Then he stabbed Trump in the back and Trump took his win away. Bravo!

Doug Ford's populus victory returned the Conservatives to power in Ontario after 15 years in opposition.

Thursday, June 7, 2018

Bilderberg 2018

In an unprecedented move, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State, will take part in the Bilderberg Conference, an annual private gathering of global political, business and media leaders, taking place this year in Turin, Italy, June 7-10. It will be the first time in history, over 64 years, that a high-ranking Vatican official will take part in the Bilderberg Conferences. Parolin’s name is included in the list of 131 participants in this year’s event. Other 2018 attendees that Americans may recognize include: James Baker, Niall Ferguson, Henry Kissinger, Peggy Noonan, David Petraeus, Robert Rubin, Peter Thiel, and Larry Summers. The only person on the list who appears to be an ally of the Trump administration is Peter Thiel. The rest are Globalists. BTW, I wonder if the timing of the IG report release was moved to June 11th for two reasons. To follow the Bilderberg conference so it could not be discussed at the meeting...and also because President Trump will be in Singapore that day for the North Korean summit? Just a thought. 
Started in 1954 the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, The Netherlands, and named after the same hotel, the Bilderberg Conference gathers each year some 120-150 participants, among them European and North American political elites, along with industrial, financial, academic and media figures.
The first meeting took place at the invitation of Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld. Co-founders of the meeting were Polish politician Jozef Retinger, former Belgian prime minister Paul van Zeeland, and Paul Rijkens, who was then the head of Unilever. The success of the first meeting brought the organizers to stage an annual meeting.
According to the groups’ official website, about two-thirds of the participants come from Europe, and the rest from North America, and one-third are political figures or government officials.
This year’s meeting is set to discuss populism (Trumpism and Brexit), the challenges of inequality, the future of work, artificial intelligence, U.S. midterm elections, free trade, U.S. global leadership, Russia, quantum computing, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran, and other current events (see below for the official agenda.) The Bilderberg meeting’s official website stresses that discussions are private, no minutes are taken and no reports are written.
The meetings are held under the so-called “Chatham House Rules,” an agreement typical of off-the-record meetings among academics or political leaders. According to that agreement, participants are free to use the information received, but they cannot disclose the identity nor the affiliation of speakers, nor can they disclose the other participants taking part in the conversation. Dubbed by critics to be a kind of “global shadow government”, and targeted by protesters who picket the meeting, the Bilderberg meeting has has an official website since 2011, and publishes the names of participants in the annual meeting the day before the gathering begins.
The cardinal’s participation in the Bilderberg Group could be part of a strategy of dialogue the Holy See is engaging with the small influential elite group. Last year, Parolin took part in the World Economic Forum in Davos, and there he delivered a speech in which he listed the aims of pontifical diplomacy.

The 66th Bilderberg Meeting to take place from 7 - 10 June 2018 in Turin, Italy
TURIN, 5 JUNE 2018 –The 66th Bilderberg Meeting is set to take place from 7 - 10 June 2018 in Turin, Italy. As of today, 131 participants from 23 countries have confirmed their attendance. As ever, a diverse group of political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media has been invited. The list of participants is available on www.bilderbergmeetings.org.
The key topics for discussion this year include:
  1. Populism in Europe
  2. The inequality challenge
  3. The future of work
  4. Artificial intelligence
  5. The US before midterms
  6. Free trade
  7. US world leadership
  8. Russia
  9. Quantum computing
  10. Saudi Arabia and Iran
  11. The “post-truth” world
  12. Current events
Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg Meeting is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-140 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; approximately a quarter from politics and government and the rest from other fields.

The conference is a forum for informal discussions about major issues facing the world. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor any other participant may be revealed.
Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights. There is no desired outcome, no minutes are taken and no report is written. Furthermore, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.

List of Participants: 

CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE

Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman, Institut Montaigne

 PARTICIPANTS

Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Chairman Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG; Treasurer, Foundation Bilderberg Meetings
Agius, Marcus (GBR), Chairman, PA Consulting Group
Alesina, Alberto (ITA), Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Economics, Harvard University
Altman, Roger C. (USA), Founder and Senior Chairman, Evercore
Amorim, Paula (PRT), Chairman, Américo Amorim Group
Anglade, Dominique (CAN), Deputy Premier of Quebec; Minister of Economy, Science and Innovation
Applebaum, Anne (POL), Columnist, Washington Post; Professor of Practice, London School of Economics
Azoulay, Audrey (INT), Director-General, UNESCO
Baker, James H. (USA), Director, Office of Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense
Barbizet, Patricia (FRA), President, Temaris & Associés
Barroso, José M. Durão (PRT), Chairman, Goldman Sachs International; Former President, European Commission
Beerli, Christine (CHE), Former Vice-President, International Committee of the Red Cross
Berx, Cathy (BEL), Governor, Province of Antwerp
Beurden, Ben van (NLD), CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
Blanquer, Jean-Michel (FRA), Minister of National Education, Youth and Community Life
Botín, Ana P. (ESP), Group Executive Chairman, Banco Santander
Bouverot, Anne (FRA), Board Member; Former CEO, Morpho
Brandtzæg, Svein Richard (NOR), President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
Brende, Børge (INT), President, World Economic Forum
Brennan, Eamonn (IRL), Director General, Eurocontrol
Brnabic, Ana (SRB), Prime Minister
Burns, William J. (USA), President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Burwell, Sylvia M. (USA), President, American University
Caracciolo, Lucio (ITA), Editor-in-Chief, Limes
Carney, Mark J. (GBR), Governor, Bank of England
Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman, Institut Montaigne; Chairman, Steering Committee Bilderberg Meetings
Cattaneo, Elena (ITA), Director, Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, University of Milan
Cazeneuve, Bernard (FRA), Partner, August Debouzy; Former Prime Minister
Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, El País
Champagne, François-Philippe (CAN), Minister of International Trade
Cohen, Jared (USA), Founder and CEO, Jigsaw at Alphabet Inc.
Colao, Vittorio (ITA), CEO, Vodafone Group
Cook, Charles (USA), Political Analyst, The Cook Political Report
Dagdeviren, Canan (TUR), Assistant Professor, MIT Media Lab
Donohoe, Paschal (IRL), Minister for Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform
Döpfner, Mathias (DEU), Chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE
Ecker, Andrea (AUT), Secretary General, Office Federal President of Austria
Elkann, John (ITA), Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Émié, Bernard (FRA), Director General, Ministry of the Armed Forces
Enders, Thomas (DEU), CEO, Airbus SE
Fallows, James (USA), Writer and Journalist
Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA), President and CEO, TIAA
Ferguson, Niall (USA), Milbank Family Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Fischer, Stanley (USA), Former Vice-Chairman, Federal Reserve; Former Governor, Bank of Israel
Gilvary, Brian (GBR), Group CFO, BP plc
Goldstein, Rebecca (USA), Visiting Professor, New York University
Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor "Otto e mezzo", La7 TV
Hajdarowicz, Greg (POL), Founder and President, Gremi International Sarl
Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Chairman Foundation Bilderberg Meetings
Hassabis, Demis (GBR), Co-Founder and CEO, DeepMind
Hedegaard, Connie (DNK), Chair, KR Foundation; Former European Commissioner
Helgesen, Vidar (NOR), Ambassador for the Ocean
Herlin, Antti (FIN), Chairman, KONE Corporation
Hickenlooper, John (USA), Governor of Colorado
Hobson, Mellody (USA), President, Ariel Investments LLC
Hodgson, Christine (GBR), Chairman, Capgemini UK plc
Hoffman, Reid (USA), Co-Founder, LinkedIn; Partner, Greylock Partners
Horowitz, Michael C. (USA), Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
Hwang, Tim (USA), Director, Harvard-MIT Ethics and Governance of AI Initiative
Ischinger, Wolfgang (INT), Chairman, Munich Security Conference
Jacobs, Kenneth M. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Lazard
Kaag, Sigrid (NLD), Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation
Karp, Alex (USA), CEO, Palantir Technologies
Kissinger, Henry A. (USA), Chairman, Kissinger Associates Inc.
Kleinfeld, Klaus (USA), CEO, NEOM
Knot, Klaas H.W. (NLD), President, De Nederlandsche Bank
Koç, Ömer M. (TUR), Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
Köcher, Renate (DEU), Managing Director, Allensbach Institute for Public Opinion Research
Kotkin, Stephen (USA), Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University
Kragic, Danica (SWE), Professor, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH
Kravis, Henry R. (USA), Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, KKR
Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA), Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute; President, American Friends of Bilderberg
Kudelski, André (CHE), Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
Lepomäki, Elina (FIN), MP, National Coalition Party
Leyen, Ursula von der (DEU), Federal Minster of Defence
Leysen, Thomas (BEL), Chairman, KBC Group
Makan, Divesh (USA), CEO, ICONIQ Capital
Massolo, Giampiero (ITA), Chairman, Fincantieri Spa.; President, ISPI
Mazzucato, Mariana (ITA), Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value, University College London
Mead, Walter Russell (USA), Distinguished Fellow, Hudson Institute
Michel, Charles (BEL), Prime Minister
Micklethwait, John (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP
Minton Beddoes, Zanny (GBR), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Mitsotakis, Kyriakos (GRC), President, New Democracy Party
Mota, Isabel (PRT), President, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation
Moyo, Dambisa F. (USA), Global Economist and Author
Mundie, Craig J. (USA), President, Mundie & Associates
Neven, Hartmut (USA), Director of Engineering, Google Inc.
Noonan, Peggy (USA), Author and Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
Oettinger, Günther H. (INT), Commissioner for Budget & Human Resources, European Commission
O'Leary, Michael (IRL), CEO, Ryanair D.A.C.
O'Neill, Onora (GBR), Emeritus Honorary Professor in Philosophy, University of Cambridge
Osborne, George (GBR), Editor, London Evening Standard
Özkan, Behlül (TUR), Associate Professor in International Relations, Marmara University
Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC), CEO, Titan Cement Company S.A.
Parolin, H.E. Pietro (VAT), Cardinal and Secretary of State
Patino, Bruno (FRA), Chief Content Officer, Arte France TV
Petraeus, David H. (USA), Chairman, KKR Global Institute
Pichette, Patrick (CAN), General Partner, iNovia Capital
Pouyanné, Patrick (FRA), Chairman and CEO, Total S.A.
Pring, Benjamin (USA), Co-Founder and Managing Director, Center for the Future of Work
Rankka, Maria (SWE), CEO, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Ratas, Jüri (EST), Prime Minister
Rendi-Wagner, Pamela (AUT), MP (SPÖ); Former Minister of Health
Rivera Díaz, Albert (ESP), President, Ciudadanos Party
Rossi, Salvatore (ITA), Senior Deputy Governor, Bank of Italy
Rubesa, Baiba A. (LVA), CEO, RB Rail AS
Rubin, Robert E. (USA), Co-Chairman Emeritus, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Treasury Secretary
Rudd, Amber (GBR), MP; Former Secretary of State, Home Department
Rutte, Mark (NLD), Prime Minister
Sabia, Michael (CAN), President and CEO, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec
Sadjadpour, Karim (USA), Senior Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Sáenz de Santamaría, Soraya (ESP), Deputy Prime Minister
Sawers, John (GBR), Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners
Schadlow, Nadia (USA), Former Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy
Schneider-Ammann, Johann N. (CHE), Federal Councillor
Scholten, Rudolf (AUT), President, Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue
Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL), Senior Fellow, Harvard University; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Poland
Simsek, Mehmet (TUR), Deputy Prime Minister
Skartveit, Hanne (NOR), Political Editor, Verdens Gang
Stoltenberg, Jens (INT), Secretary General, NATO
Summers, Lawrence H. (USA), Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University
Thiel, Peter (USA), President, Thiel Capital
Topsøe, Jakob Haldor (DNK), Chairman, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S
Turpin, Matthew (USA), Director for China, National Security Council
Wahlroos, Björn (FIN), Chairman, Sampo Group, Nordea Bank, UPM-Kymmene Corporation
Wallenberg, Marcus (SWE), Chairman, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB
Woods, Ngaire (GBR), Dean, Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University
Yetkin, Murat (TUR), Editor-in-chief, Hürriyet Daily News
Zeiler, Gerhard (AUT), President, Turner International

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants.html




Tuesday, June 5, 2018

French President Wants To Control the Press - Nazi Germany 2.0

All of Europe is turning into Nazi Germany, where the Minister of Truth censored all speech against the Nazi regime and spread hateful propaganda against the Jews. Now, French President Emmanuel Macron has come up with an idea for a censorship law - halting the publication of information his Government deems to be false ahead of elections. President Emmanuel Macron was himself targeted during his 2017 campaign by online rumors that he was gay and had a secret bank account in the Bahamas.
The law would allow social networks to introduce measures allowing users to flag up false reports, pass their data on such articles to authorities. Judges will have just 48 hours to rule on an urgent request to take down a post deemed "fake." And the law would authorize the state to take foreign broadcasters off the air altogether if they were attempting to attack France.
The British government has set up a censorship unit, while Italy has an online service to report false articles and the European Union is working on a "code of practice" that would provide guidelines for social media companies.
France wants to go further -- though not as far as neighbouring Germany, where social networks face fines of up to 50 million euros ($58 million) under a controversial law which critics say is overly draconian.
Some opponents fear French authorities could use powers in the new law to block embarrassing or compromising reports. Others worry the law could backfire by giving extra credibility to reports labelled "fake" by the Government amongst those convinced the government is out to hide the truth.
The government insists measures will be built into the law to protect freedom of speech, with only reports that are "manifestly false" and that have gone viral.
"It's a step towards censorship. It's potentially dangerous. It will only reinforce a sense of defiance towards the press and politicians who are already very discredited. Is France still a democracy if it muzzles its citizens? The law is not only imperfect and unnecessary, but also dangerous for the peace and diversity of public debate. It will turn judges into arbiters of true and false. I cannot defend measures under which it's considered normal to block all kinds of information because it's considered close to a foreign government."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/frances-fake-news-law-leaves-media-experts-uneasy-145712000.html

Monday, June 4, 2018

Why Are We Not Treating Estrogen In Water Supply? It Causes Cancer & Gender Dysmorphia.

A huge genetic study now says chemotherapy doesn't help women with early-stage breast cancer. Most women don’t need treatment beyond surgery and hormone therapy. Right now, some 70,000 women are year undergo needless, harmful and expensive chemotherapy. The breast cancer study focused on cases where chemo’s value increasingly is in doubt: women with early-stage disease that has not spread to lymph nodes and is hormone-positive (caused by estrogen and progesterone.)
Cancer care has been evolving away from chemotherapy — older drugs with harsh side effects — in favor of gene-targeting therapies, hormone blockers and immune system treatments. When chemo is used now, it’s sometimes for shorter periods or lower doses than it once was.
Here's my question. Many scientists believe that breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men has skyrocketed since the 70's, and men have become more feminized, due to estrogen in contraceptives and replacement therapy and their resulting infiltration of our water and food through urine and disposal. Every time a woman takes a birth control pill or a hormone replacement pill or a transgender is treated with hormones, it goes right into our water supply. Since we know that hormones are causing cancer and gender dysmorphia, why are we recommending hormone therapy to the afflicted? Why aren't we educating the public and treating our water supplies? Seems counterintuitive.

https://apnews.com/9f30770a3a3d42538cd3f14672cd6529/Many-breast-cancer-patients-can-skip-chemo,-big-study-finds

https://nypost.com/2017/07/03/birth-control-pills-are-turning-male-fish-into-females/

https://www.livescience.com/17028-prostate-cancer-risk-birth-control.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/health/birth-control-breast-cancer-hormones.html

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Broward County Refused To Let Paramedics Treat Students. Then They Died.

BREAKING: New documents released confirm that Hillary and Debby Wasserman Schultz's pals at the Broward County Sheriff's office refused to let paramedics treat wounded students at Parkland. That's why so many died. Before you tell me that the scene wasn't safe, let me dispute that BS.
Paramedics kept asking for permission for additional medics, assigned to a Rescue Task Force, to go into rooms that had already been searched and found to be safe, to quickly extract and treat the wounded. They were told by the Broward County Sheriff Israel's commander that she “would have to check before approving this request.” They were DENIED six times. By then all the students were dead.
Even after authorities saw delayed surveillance footage showing the shooter had fled the building, those Coral Springs fire-rescue forces and paramedics were not permitted in. So, not only did the Broward County police, and school resource officer Scot Peterson, hide in the bushes and behind cars and not confront the shooter, they stopped first responders from treating victims until everyone was dead. What really happened at Parkland? Who really killed those kids? What didn't Sheriff Israel want the paramedics to see? If this doesn't convince you that it was more than just a "botched" rescue, nothing will.
Reports of paramedics being kept, for their safety, from entering the school is another lie fed to the media by Broward County. The latest records — some 80 pages — released by Coral Springs fire officials show that the Broward Sheriff’s Office also failed to set up an effective central command post, contributing to the confusion and frustration among the medics. The same issue was a problem in the January 2017 Fort Lauderdale airport killings — the last major shooting the Sheriff’s Office handled. The Broward County Sheriff's office is being sued for wrongful death in that shooting as well, obviously engineered for the gun control lobby. 6 people died.
The Coral Springs’ Rescue Task Force medics were eager to get inside to help but were thwarted six times for permission to enter “and all requests were denied.”
On the day this horrific news was released, prosecutors released a video of Nikolas Cruz from his cell phone. Really? Four months after the fact, they release a fake video of autistic Nikolas Cruz saying he planned the attack - the same day it is confimed that the Broward County Sheriff's office LET THOSE KIDS DIE? An obvious deflection from their culpability.
Digital editing techniques are so advanced that they can create fake video and audio that CANNOT be contested in court -- with only a photograph and a few spoken words. They had four months to create this one of Nikolas Cruz. If it was real, they would have released it on February 16. Not May 31. That kid didn't kill anyone. The gun grabbers did. 
For more, see:  https://unfakenews9856.blogspot.com/2018/04/why-i-believe-nikolas-cruz-didnt-kill.html

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Italy's New Trump-Like Government Fighting Back Against Illegals

Italy is tired of being the dumping ground for the MENA's illegals into Europe and electing leaders that are fighting back against Soros and the Communist Globalist UN establishment and human traffickers. Sound familiar?
"The good times for illegals are over -- get ready to pack your bags. The free ride is over. Countries need to start doing their job and no more smugglers should be docking in Italian ports. These NGOs are taxis on the sea for illegals. Italy spends over 4 billion euros on illegals - half of which goes to "welcome centers." Arrivals must stop and deportations must rise," said Italy's new interior minister, Matteo Salvini, who took his oath of office on June 1st. He was speaking at a rally before an angry group of Italian citizens who live in a port town. Earlier, Salvini joined Premier Giuseppe Conte and the rest of the newly sworn-in Cabinet - a Trump-like populist Government.
Why are Italians so overwhelmed by massive illegal trafficking to Italy from North Africa and the Middle East (MENA)? In the past, illegals would travel through to Northern Europe. Now those countries are building WALLS and PROCESSING centers to stop illegals from entering Germany, France, Switzerland, and Austria … and Italy is paying the price.
Italy's former left-wing government and authorities and militias in Libya are responsible for the trafficking of massive numbers of illegals into Europe since Hillary Clinton and her cronies engineered the fall of Gaddafi, the policeman of the region, and opened up the horn of Africa to Europe.
Since 2013, Italy has "received" more than 700,000 illegals. To speed up deportations -- of which there were just 6,500 in 2017 -- Salvini will have to increase the number of detention centers and sign agreements with origin countries, many of which are not eager to take back their citizens. In a bid to find funds, Salvini is eying the billions of euros set aside every year to deal with the "demands" of illegals - which are many.
In 2017, the former left-wing government announced a budget of some 4.2 billion euros for migrants, of which 18 percent is for rescues at sea, 13 percent for health care, and 65 percent for migrant reception centers, which host some 170,000 people. The centers in particular attract Salvini's ire. The vast majority of existing centers are run by cooperatives or NGOs who were promised 25-35 euros per day for each person they provide with lodging, clothes and other services including legal aid or psychological support. It's a huge profit center for NGOs.
Salvini will be in Luxembourg Tuesday for a meeting of EU interior ministers to discuss EU's controversial Dublin rule, whereby would-be refugees must file for asylum in the first bloc member-state they enter. The accord heavily penalizes Italy, which has seen more than 700,000 migrants arrive since 2013.

In early years the vast majority of illegals would continue their journey to northern Europe. But now, the introduction of EU-backed processing centers to ensure migrants are identified at their first European entry point, and tighter border controls and border walls installed by France, Switzerland and Austria to STOP illegals, are now creating roadblocks. In other words, Northern Europe has had enough and is building walls and Italy is being dumped on. Salvini says no more. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6439133/matteo-salvini-italy-government-five-star-league-illegal-migrants-deportations/




Roseanne Isn't a Racist

Here's what the media is hiding. The side conversation on Twitter that Roseanne replied to and was fired for. It's obvious from the full exchange that she was not being racist - in fact she even pointed out that Valerie Jarrett was Muslim and Muslim was not a "race." Roseanne said she didn't even know Valerie Jarrett was black. Neither did most people. This proves it.


The media also didn't mention all the other tweets she made over the past few days that must have really pissed off Obama, Soros and Clinton:

"[Tommy Robinson] has tried to report on rape gangs being protected in UK. He was just arrested - which is a death sentence - please get involved! It's sick pedo shit.
As soon as Americans unite against the disinformation MK Ultra classist narrative, the better we will all be. Do people really not get that this lefty shit is all an act to break them all the way down?
Soros' goal: The overthrow of the US constitutional republic by buying and backing political candidates for local district attorney races who will ignore US law & favor 'feelings' instead. Then call everyone who is alarmed by that 'racist'.
Chelsea Soros Clinton.
CORRECTION: CHELSEA CLINTON IS NOT MARRIED TO A SOROS NEPHEW. HER HUSBAND IS THE SON OF A CORRUPT SENATOR, SO SORRY!
By the way, George Soros is a Nazi who turned in his fellow Jews to be murdered in German concentration camps & stole their wealth-were you aware of that? But, we all make mistakes, right Chelsea?
ISLAM is not a RACE, lefties. Islam includes EVERY RACE of people.
Want to know why Israelis have little patience for Jewish Democrats? Jews need to leave the Democrat shtetl (jewish ghetto) as well.
Most of my family are Liberals. I love them all, we just disagree on some things."
She wasn't fired for the Jarrett statement. She was fired because she is a Trump supporter and they wanted to get rid of her.

Mahmood Khan - Notorious Slumlord in Minneapolis.

Frustrated low-income tenants of DISGRACED SLUMLORD Mahmood Khan blasted Mahmood Khan and the city of Minneapolis, including Mayor Jacob Frey, for failing to help them as they face a court-ordered eviction on Aug. 31. Frey vowed to aid the tenants, who have been living for years in Mahmood's substandard housing in North Minneapolis. This has been going on for three years and, so far, the city HAS DONE NOTHING. Why is the city of Minneapolis protecting Mahmood Khan?
The renters filed a tenant remedies action against Khan, and housing court referee Mark Labine appointed Lighthouse Management to oversee the properties and decide whether it was economically viable to repair them. Lighthouse concluded that it would cost $2.1 million to $2.9 million to make the homes habitable for the next five to 15 years, and that rent payments would be insufficient to cover those costs. It recommended that tenants be evicted by Aug. 31, which Labine ordered, asking the city to help with relocation. About 30 of the residences still have tenants in them. Some have said they want to move, but others say they will stay beyond the Aug. 31 deadline.
“When it comes to helping the tenants, there has been a systematic failure by many different city departments and an acknowledgment of it by city staff and the mayor. We’ve been getting lip service from Frey since last November. Everybody is stressed. We are passed off from one agency to the next. Why not help us buy the homes? Khan bought the homes cheaply, then collected thousands of dollars of rent monthly with minimal upkeep. He once tried to sell all his buildings on Craigslist for $4.5 million."
How did this happen?
Minneapolis landlord Mahmood Khan has been battling the city for years over the licenses on his 42 rental properties, most of which are low-income duplexes and single-family homes scattered around north Minneapolis. Between 2008 and 2015, Khan’s 42 rental properties racked up 3,550 housing violations and garnered more than 2,200 visits from city housing inspectors.
The city began the process of revoking Khan’s licenses in early 2015. The City Council then voted in 2016 to officially pull the licenses, but delayed it until Khan exhausted his appeals.  Khan filed a separate federal lawsuit against the city, saying it is violating the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against a protected class of minority renters.  Khan appealed the city’s efforts to yank his licenses, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in the city’s favor. Khan then asked the Minnesota Supreme Court to hear the case. The high court refused to grant a hearing to Mahmood Khan in November 2017.  Then the City Council in December revoked all of Khan’s rental licenses.
"We never expected the United States Supreme Court to accept this case and it was just another instance of delay on the part of Mr. Khan," said Minneapolis City Attorney Susan Segal.
"These requests for services at Mr. Khan's properties have led to an inordinate number of site visits by housing inspectors to the properties resulting in an astounding number of written orders. The number of site visits and re-inspections to these properties has caused a drain on city resources and would not be necessary if the owner was proactive in his management of these properties." 
Despite penalities, Khan's tenants are still waiting for repairs. Three months after Khan lost his landlord licenses, most major repair work has not yet begun leaving them in inhabitable conditions. Many do not have water or electricity.  Mold around the windows. Faulty electric wiring. Peeling lead paint and asbestos in the basement.
Officials say these problems and dozens more permeate houses owned by landlord Mahmood Khan. Barring major repairs and renovations, many of them are borderline unsuitable for tenants.
After Khan’s legal options were exhausted, the city of Minneapolis stripped him of his approximately 43 rental licenses in December, putting hundreds of tenants in limbo. Housing Court referee Mark Labine appointed an administrator, Lighthouse Management, to do immediate repairs, study the economic viability of rehabilitating the buildings and then report back to him on what they recommend. 
Urban Homeworks, a local nonprofit, has been given responsibility by Lighthouse to review the problems in Khan’s 32 homes and duplexes where tenants are still living, and the buildings are in need of major overhaul. “I would rank [Khan’s buildings] among the worst that I have seen."
Khan, who works part-time as a flight attendant, said he’s been acquiring properties on the north side of Minneapolis since the 1980s and bought a batch of them a decade ago during the foreclosure crisis. Tenant advocates note that many of his tenants are poor blacks with housing records that included previous evictions, making it difficult to find better places to rent.  
Khan said he will rent to people when no one else will. I want to know where he got the money to buy 42 properties. Sharia financing?


http://adventuresofjohnnynorthside.blogspot.com/2009/10/photographic-tour-of-mahmood-khans.html



Massive Fires - Marijuana Drug Cartels

The media are reporting massive wildfires in Colorado. If you wonder why there seems to be so many more wildfires these days, it's partly due to the unforseen consequences of the legalization of marijuana. Law enforcement authorities – including senior Department of Homeland Security officials – and key people within the legal marijuana business say that the areas hit hardest by the fires are the same places that the marijuana industry legally grows cannabis, and are now starting to suspect foul play. The suspicious timing and sheer destruction of the fires has led them to believe the Mexican drug cartels – infamous for their ruthless tactics – had a hand in starting them. These cartels, which run a large share of the world’s multi-billion dollar illegal drug trade, certainly have the means to commit widespread arson in the United States. They also have an enormous incentive to drive up prices and hurt their competitors, and these fires are already accomplishing that. If Mexican drug lord involvement is confirmed, it will likely spark an international crisis between the United States and Mexico over the latter’s failure to rein in its criminal cartels.

For more than a decade, the Mexican drug cartels have been illegally growing weed in the forests of the United States, and federal agencies have had mixed success destroying these illicit crops. Today, California is the epicenter of black-market marijuana in the U.S., with over 90 percent of the country’s illegal marijuana farms. The authorities say they’re finding cartel-affiliated weed on government-owned lands in states including Oregon, Utah, Washington, Nevada and Arizona, all of which permit some form of medical marijuana. The problem has gotten so bad that Colorado began partnering with the Mexican Consulate to bust the narcos. Today, activists in California counties such as Calaveras are pushing back, trying to ban cannabis farms to cut off the cartels. They say drug traffickers are importing automatic weapons and using illegal, highly toxic pesticides that are eviscerating forest animals and poisoning freshwater sources. “We’re going down the toilet bowl,” says Calaveras County Sheriff Rick DiBasilio, “and it’s not going to get any better.”

Was 9/11 Planned To Make All Of America Muslim? You Decide.

This is speech given in Saudi Arabia and published in the Washington Times in 2007 about the future political and "intelligence operation" aspirations for Muslims in the U.S. Written over 12 years ago. Right before Obama became President. Proof that it's not organic. It's planned. I find it disturbing that the Palestinian cleric says that the 9/11 terror attack was positive because it "spurred Americans to learn more about Islam and Muslims." WTH. 3,000 Americans died so we could learn more about Islam? Was 9/11 planned to make all of America Muslim by shaming Americans into submission?
Cleric hopeful for U.S. Muslims
By - The Washington Times - Monday, August 6, 2007
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Muslims are steadily improving their position in U.S. society, contrary to the image of a community besieged by suspicions of links to militants, a leading U.S. Muslim cleric said yesterday.
Yahya Hendi, a prayer leader who teaches at Georgetown University, said the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. cities spurred Americans to learn more about Islam and Muslims to affirm their U.S. identity.
“I think the future is bright, because of our wisdom in dealing with the reality,” Mr. Hendi, a Palestinian by birth, said at a gathering of Saudi academics on a visit to Saudi Arabia.
“There are serious efforts being made among the second and third generation to become part of the political establishment. The challenge we face is in the media and from some Christian extremists who don’t want an Islamic presence in America.”
Mr. Hendi said U.S. Muslims were working on “nationalizing” Islam as part of the fabric of U.S. society, including cutting funding links to Muslim countries.
“Last year, we elected the first Muslim to Congress, and I expect that by 2015, there will be three or four, as well as at least 30 mayors,” he said, adding that the number of Muslim lawyers in the United States has multiplied since September 11.
Those terrorist attacks, in which 19 Arab Muslims killed about 3,000 people in New York and Washington, led to strict security measures in the United States that some rights groups say often unfairly target Arabs and Muslims.
Mr. Hendi, who met with President Bush days after September 11, said Muslims exhibited a tendency to shun political action such as voting and running for office because it was considered akin to surrendering to U.S. culture.
He said he did not feel there was general animosity toward Muslims in American society, and that he encouraged Muslims to join intelligence bodies such as the CIA and FBI.
Islam has about 17,000 converts a year in the United States, but that is behind converts to Buddhism and evangelical Christianity, he said.
Mr. Hendi told his Saudi audience that he did not believe in judging Muslims and non-Muslims over practices such as wearing the hijab head cover or praying five times a day.
Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest sites and 15 of the September 11 attackers, practices a strict form of Sunni Islam that gives clerics wide power to ensure rites are followed to the letter. Many Saudi clerics denounce Shi’ites as heretics.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/aug/6/cleric-hopeful-for-us-muslims/

Friday, June 1, 2018

Why Won't Facebook Respond To My Appeals?

These are the print screens of my, Peggy Traeger Tierney's, numerous attempts to file an appeal with Facebook regarding their blocking my account for 30 days because of my post reporting on Chelsea Manning's suicide attempt. Facebook asked me to  tell them why I should be unblocked. I then wrote an appeal, per their request. They then tell me they are "unable to process my request." Is this how it works? Phony requests for customer feedback? Blocking people for no reason?

This is what I wrote and am trying to send to Facebook. Does anyone know how to get it to them? 


"Facebook: There was nothing hateful in my post reporting on the suicide attempt by Chelsea Manning. It was the truth. Every statement I made is supported by research and relevant articles written by mainstream news sources that you allow to appear on Facebook. My opinion that transgenderism is a mental illness is well-documented. Even the most famous gay feminist of all time - Camille Paglia - agrees with me. She says transgenderism is a fad of culture and sign of society decay. Many scholars and medical professionals agree that transgenderism is a mental illness - no different than anorexia or body dysmorphia. Also, the suicide rate for transgenders is extremely high and pre and post surgery rates are the same. Why am I blocked for expressing an opinion that transgenderism should be dealt with through therapy and not normalized and glorified. Tell me where the law says that group should be provided special privileges? I am deaf. I am not allowed in the military...nor should I be. I have a physical disability that prevents me from serving. I am not granted special privileges. 


IMHO, transgenders have a mental disability that should prevent them from serving. The military PROHIBITS people with conditions like ADHD, bipolar, anorexia, depression, self-mutiliation, OCD, addiction, mood disorders - not to mention countless medical conditions - from serving. Why is it wrong for me to express my opinion that a transgender individual has mental health issues that cannot be resolved with surgery and that it is a mental disability that should render them unfit for military duty? Why is it wrong for me to inform the public that Chelsea Manning, who is running for a Senate seat in Maryland, announced on Twitter she wanted to kill herself...with a photo standing on the ledge of a tall building? Don't you think voters need to have that kind of information to make a sound decision about the leadership of our nation? You want voters to know every other element of a candidate's background. Including their sexual history. Yet, a suicide attempt is not worthy news to be reported on Facebook? I think a suicide threat should be reported for ANY candidate running for office. There is nothing hateful in the truth."

Peggy Traeger Tierney